Two-Color Revising · Period 3
13 students find evidence but stop before explaining it.
Grade 5 · Period 3
24 of 26 submitted
Not started: Dylan H., Rosa V.
Pull these students first
Drifting: highlighting the wrong things
Their yellow and purple marks landed on plot, not on prompt keywords or jar meaning. Highlighting is off-target, so the revision will be too. Model one paragraph with them before they continue.
NSNadia S.
LGLuis G.
LTLayla T.
The big teaching moment
13 students marked evidence but little meaning
Plenty of yellow (prompt keywords), almost no purple (what the jar means). They can find a quote but retell it instead of explaining it. This is a whole-group mini-lesson: name the quote, then say what it reveals.
MBMarcus B.
TWTyler W.
DMDiego M.
CVCarlos V.
ESEthan S.
BHBrandon H.
DCDevin C.
JDJamal D.
CDChloe D.
OPOwen P.
ZRZoe R.
PKPriya K.
HMHannah M.
Balance of marks across the class
Evidence vs. meaning
3Off-target
13Evidence only
8Both
Analytical (8): Aiden L., Sofia A., Emma R., Mia N., Grace O., Isabella F., Aaliyah J., and Noah B. balanced both colors. Their revised paragraphs make good models to show under the document camera.
If this class drafted today
Projected ECR score from the balance of evidence and explanation.
Not yet
Developing
On track
Strong
The 13 in the middle band are one skill away from moving up: turning a highlighted quote into a sentence of explanation. That single move is the fastest points this class can gain.
Sample report with hypothetical class data. Projected scores are directional estimates from pre-writing signals, not official STAAR scores.